AssetLab LogoAssetLab.ca
    20-Year Horizon
    FCI Forecasting
    Risk-Based Prioritization
    Multi-Scenario Planning

    Strategic Planning That Sees 20 Years Ahead

    From Today's Decisions to Tomorrow's Infrastructure

    Stop guessing about capital needs. AssetLab calculates exactly when assets need replacement, how much they'll cost, and which ones matter most—across a 20-year planning horizon. Prioritize by risk, model funding scenarios, track facility condition trends, and justify every capital dollar with data that stakeholders trust.

    20 Years
    Planning Horizon
    FCI Tracking
    Facility Condition Index
    Risk Matrix
    Priority Optimization
    3 Scenarios
    Budget Modeling

    How Strategic Planning Actually Works in AssetLab

    Four integrated modules that turn asset data into long-term strategic decisions

    1

    Asset Lifecycle Analysis

    Calculate lifecycle percentage for every asset based on installation date, expected lifespan, and actual age. Identify assets approaching end-of-life across your entire portfolio.

    174
    Assets tracked
    23
    at 80%+ lifecycle
    Avg
    lifespan: 22 years
    2

    Replacement Value Forecasting

    Current Replacement Value (CRV) automatically calculated using purchase cost, installation year, inflation rates, and system-specific multipliers. Know exactly what replacements will cost.

    $8.6M
    portfolio value
    3.2%
    annual inflation
    System
    multipliers applied
    3

    Risk-Based Prioritization

    Priority matrix combines Consequence of Failure (CoF) × Likelihood of Failure (LoF) across 6 impact categories: safety, service, environmental, financial, regulatory, and reputation.

    12
    CRITICAL assets
    28
    HIGH priority
    Risk
    scores 1-100
    4

    Multi-Scenario Budget Planning

    Model optimistic, realistic, and pessimistic funding scenarios. Track annual budgets by category, identify funding gaps, and forecast facility condition impact of budget constraints.

    3
    scenarios modeled
    $2.1M
    funding gap
    FCI
    impact projected

    Your 20-Year Replacement Roadmap

    Every asset's replacement timeline calculated based on lifecycle, condition, and strategic priorities

    2029

    Balanced Approach

    Projected Replacement Cost
    $0.8M
    Projected FCI
    11.0%
    Poor
    Available Budget
    $0.8M
    $0.0M gap

    Assets Scheduled for Replacement

    HVAC Chiller #3 (Building A)
    $180k
    CRITICAL
    Electrical Panel 2B
    $45k
    HIGH
    Roof Section D
    $320k
    MEDIUM
    Backup Generator
    $75k
    HIGH

    Risk-Based Prioritization Matrix

    Replace assets based on actual risk, not just age. Prioritize by Consequence of Failure × Likelihood of Failure across 6 impact dimensions.

    Safety Critical

    CRITICAL
    12
    Assets
    Total Replacement Value$2.4M

    Service Critical

    HIGH
    28
    Assets
    Total Replacement Value$3.2M

    Moderate Risk

    MEDIUM
    45
    Assets
    Total Replacement Value$1.8M

    Low Risk

    LOW
    89
    Assets
    Total Replacement Value$1.2M

    6 Risk Assessment Dimensions

    Safety Impact

    Risk to personnel, public, or building occupants

    Service Impact

    Impact on operational continuity and service delivery

    Environmental Impact

    Environmental contamination or regulatory violation

    Financial Impact

    Direct costs and indirect revenue loss from failure

    Regulatory Impact

    Code compliance, permits, and legal obligations

    Reputation Impact

    Brand damage, stakeholder confidence, media attention

    Risk Score Formula

    Risk Score = Consequence of Failure (CoF) × Likelihood of Failure (LoF)

    Each dimension rated 1-10, aggregated to calculate total CoF. LoF based on asset age, condition score, maintenance history, and manufacturer reliability data.

    Facility Condition Index (FCI) Forecasting

    Track facility deterioration over time. FCI = Deferred Maintenance Cost ÷ Current Replacement Value

    Site FCI History & Projections

    0-5%
    Good (0-5%)
    Well maintained
    5-10%
    Fair (5-10%)
    Adequate condition
    10-30%
    Poor (10-30%)
    Attention needed
    >30%
    Critical (>30%)
    Immediate action

    Main Campus

    5 buildings, 348 assets

    4.2%
    Good

    South Facility

    2 buildings, 127 assets

    7.8%
    Fair

    Warehouse Complex

    3 buildings, 89 assets

    18.5%
    Poor

    Historical Tracking

    AssetLab automatically records FCI snapshots over time, creating a historical trend for each site. Track improvement from capital investments or deterioration from deferred maintenance.

    Annual Funding Budgets & Gap Analysis

    Plan capital budgets by year, site, building, and funding source. Identify gaps early, justify requests, and track actual vs. planned spending.

    Replacement

    Budgeted$2.40M
    Required$3.20M
    Funding Gap-$800k

    Repairs

    Budgeted$0.85M
    Required$0.72M
    Surplus+$130k

    PM

    Budgeted$0.65M
    Required$0.68M
    Funding Gap-$30k

    Total Portfolio Funding Gap: $2.1M

    Current budget allocation falls short of required capital investments by $2.1M annually. Without additional funding, portfolio FCI will deteriorate from 6.2% to 14.8% over the next 5 years.

    Assets at Risk
    73 Assets
    Will exceed lifecycle before replacement
    Deferred Maintenance Impact
    +$4.2M
    Additional cost if deferred 5 years

    How Organizations Use Strategic Planning

    "The 20-year forecasting completely transformed our capital planning process. We went from guessing at budget requests to presenting council with data-driven justifications backed by FCI trends and risk analysis. Our capital budget approval rate went from 60% to 95%."

    Michael Davidson
    Director of Public Works, Municipality
    95% approval rate

    "Risk-based prioritization saved us from a catastrophic failure. AssetLab flagged a chiller as CRITICAL due to safety and service impact scores, even though it was only at 75% lifecycle. We replaced it immediately—and the old one failed during removal. Would have shut down our data center."

    Jennifer Park
    Facilities Manager, Tech Company
    Crisis averted

    "Being able to model optimistic, realistic, and pessimistic scenarios lets us prepare for different funding outcomes. We show the board what happens with full funding vs. budget cuts. The visualizations make complex decisions simple."

    Robert Chen
    CFO, Educational Institution
    3 scenarios modeled

    Stop Guessing. Start Planning.

    Every asset tracked. Every replacement costed. Every risk quantified. Strategic planning that turns uncertainty into confidence—across 20 years of capital decisions.

    We Value Your Privacy

    We use cookies to provide essential functionality and optional analytics to improve your experience. Analytics cookies help us understand how you use AssetLab so we can make it better. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.