Skip to main content
All Use Cases

Reliability engineering software that turns failures into patterns

Automatic MTBF, MTTR, and OEE, Pareto failure analysis that pinpoints the few causes behind most downtime, and PM optimization that shifts you from reactive firefighting to predictive maintenance.

Automatic
MTBF & MTTR
OEE
dashboards
Pareto
failure analysis

Reliability metrics that calculate themselves

MTBF, MTTR, and OEE come straight from your work-order and failure data - no spreadsheets, no manual tallies - so you always know which assets are actually dragging uptime down.

Find the few causes behind most of the downtime

Pareto and root-cause analysis rank failure modes by impact, so you fix the three problems causing 80% of the downtime instead of chasing every one-off.

Tune the PM program with evidence

See which PMs prevent failures and which just burn labor on healthy equipment, then optimize intervals - shifting the mix from reactive firefighting to planned, predictive work.

MTBF, MTTR, and OEE without the spreadsheet

Reliability metrics are only useful if they’re current, and hand-tallied numbers never are. AssetLab calculates MTBF, MTTR, OEE, and uptime automatically from your work orders and failure records, trended over time - so you spot the asset dragging the line down before it becomes a pattern.

  • MTBF, MTTR, OEE, and uptime calculated automatically
  • Trended over time, per asset and per class
  • Benchmarked across equipment to find the worst actors
  • Always current - no manual tallies
Explore reporting & analytics →
Reliability metrics · Auto-calculated
Straight from the work orders
MTBF
2850 h
MTTR
3.2 h
OEE
84%
Uptime
96%
Reliability, measured - not guessed
Failure modes · By downtime
The vital few, ranked
Bearing wear38%
Seal failure26%
Misalignment16%
Lubrication11%
Other9%
3 causes drive 80% of the downtime

The three causes behind most of the downtime

Treating every failure as a one-off spreads your effort thin and fixes nothing for good. AssetLab’s Pareto and root-cause analysis rank failure modes by the downtime they actually cause - so you can see that a handful of causes drive most of the losses and attack those first.

  • Failure modes ranked by downtime impact
  • Pareto analysis surfaces the vital few
  • Root-cause tracking ties failures to their source
  • Effort focused where it moves the needle
Explore risk management →

From reactive firefighting to planned work

Some PMs prevent failures; others just consume labor on healthy equipment. AssetLab shows which is which, so you can tighten the intervals that matter, drop the ones that don’t, and shift the maintenance mix toward planned, predictive work that keeps assets running.

  • See which PMs actually prevent failures
  • Optimize intervals by evidence, not habit
  • Shift the mix from reactive to planned
  • More uptime from the same crew
Explore preventive maintenance →
Maintenance mix · Trending
From firefighting to planned
Reactive20%
Planned & predictive80%
Reactive 60% → 20%, same crew
Drop the PMs that don’t prevent failures, tighten the ones that do

And everything else you’d expect

Automatic MTBF/MTTR
Straight from work-order data
OEE dashboards
Availability, performance, quality
Pareto failure analysis
Rank the vital few
Root cause analysis
Failures tied to their source
Reliability trending
Per asset and per class
PM optimization
Intervals set by evidence
Criticality ranking
Effort by impact
Failure code library
Consistent failure capture
Predictive insights
Act before the break
Being able to look at a work order and see it in the context of the broader asset lifecycle, or to plan a capital replacement while already seeing the maintenance history behind it, has made me a sharper and more focused manager. I'm not toggling between systems anymore. I'm working in one place, with the full picture in front of me.
Mark Perkins
Facility Operations Manager, Calgary Winter Club
Read the full story →

Engineer the Reliability.
Out of the Data.

Bring MTBF, failure analysis, and PM optimization into one system - and move from reacting to failures to engineering them out.

No credit card required

Reliability Engineering Software FAQ

Common questions about MTBF/MTTR tracking, OEE, Pareto failure analysis, and PM optimization for reliability engineers.

What is reliability engineering software?

It’s the analytics layer of a CMMS - turning work-order and failure history into reliability metrics, failure-mode analysis, and PM optimization, so you engineer failures out instead of reacting to them.

Does AssetLab calculate MTBF and MTTR automatically?

Yes. Reporting derives MTBF, MTTR, uptime, and OEE directly from work orders and failure records and trends them over time - so the numbers are always current instead of stale spreadsheet tallies.

What is Pareto failure analysis?

It ranks failure modes by the downtime they actually cause, exposing the “vital few” - typically a handful of causes drive most losses. Combined with risk and criticality, it tells you exactly where to focus engineering effort.

Can AssetLab help optimize a PM program?

Yes. By tying failures back to assets and PMs, AssetLab shows which preventive maintenance is preventing failures and which is just consuming labor - so you tighten the intervals that matter and drop the ones that don’t.

Does AssetLab track OEE?

Yes. OEE - availability, performance, and quality - is tracked on dashboards alongside reliability metrics, so you can see the full picture of equipment effectiveness and where it’s slipping.

How does AssetLab support root cause analysis?

A consistent failure-code library captured on every work order builds the history root-cause analysis needs - so recurring problems are visible as patterns against the asset, not buried in free-text notes.